Settled For a D200
Journal Entry:
Sun Apr 27, 2008, 10:12 AM
Yes I finally caved in and bought a 'new' camera. Now, I know the D300 is a great and amazing camera. So great that no one seems to want their D200's anymore. When i found a low shutter count D200 on Ebay for only $680 I just had to go for it.
I got it in the mail on Friday but have only been able to play with the controls as I don't yet have a CF card. The card should get here by Tuesday, I can't wait. I hop too get more photos out onto deviant art soon after.
I know there will be those of you who say the D50 is a fine camera and question spending money on an already "obsolete" camera. Firstly my D50 is getting old and its showing its age at 40k shutter count. The D200 only has 1700 count. To be honest I only bought the camera for a few features. Firstly auto exposure with non CPU lenses. This means I can use my dads 11 non CPU lenses more easily outdoors. Secondly flash command with my SB-800, being able to do off camera flash should be a no brainier. Thirdly the intervalometer built into the D200 should let my do time lapses without a computer attached. Finally, its build! The the is built like a tank with gaskets and all, not to mention all the on body control.
For those you say "You should have gotten a D300" Okay I understand the D300 is revolutionary and makes all other cameras before it obsolete. Remember though, I got this D200 for only $680, thats 2 1/2 D300's. If you ask me, I don't think the difference is worth the extra $1,120.
And yes, i only wrote this to convince myself. I hope it worked.
- Mood:
Awestruck - Listening to: Lazy Days
- Reading: The text as I type it into this window
- Watching: My computer screen
- Playing: With my foot
- Drinking: Diet Coke
Devious Comments
I have a d70s and may upgrade in the next year or so and having something that would meter while using my lensbaby would be a nice although not necessary ability.
I think you made a good decision saving a ton of money and getting a great camera to boot. If you were doing fine with a d50 then d200 shouldn't be a problem of course so don't lament over not going further up the upgrade ladder.
I hope my cam doesnt give out.. now you have me worried about my shutter count, 20566, although half yours.
How was your cam "showing its age"
As the D200 is my second camera I could honestly say its a good camera. Although the D300 has Active-D lightning (which must be experienced to fully describe), its still good...and now days pretty cheap.
You´d see big difference between a D50 and a D200
--
█ Sindre, Hysteria.
--
Alex M.
My Gallery
As my D50 goes, its just a lot of little things. The shutter foam that softens the open pealed off, the USB-DC port gasket came off awhile ago, a few of the screws are starting to rust. Not to mention that i have had to fix the shutter a few times when it moved out of the track. Okay fine, I get it, I don't treat my camera's great but hey at least i have the built like a tank d200 now lol
--
Alex M.
My Gallery
Now sturdy build quality is something extra you pay for in semi pro and pro models. My d70s is pretty meaty, but it could be more so but to get a stronger cam I gotta pay more. I'll follow your new shots with d200 to see what the step from prosumer to semi pro model will be like.
--
Mommy of three
Photographer
Club Leader for *unseen-photographers
And community addict
--
Alex M.
My Gallery
Previous PageNext Page